[1] ROBERTSONP K. Soil classification using the cone penetration test [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, 27(1): 151-158.
[2] ROBERTSONK R. Interpretation of cone penetration tests-a unified approach [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1337-1355.
[3] ROBERTSONP K. Estimating in-situ state parameter in sandy soils from the CPT [C]//Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc. Proc. 2nd Intl. Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, May 9-11, 2010. Huntington Beach: Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc, 2010: 3.
[4] LOW E H, LUNNET, ANDERSENH K, et al. Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays [J]. Géotechnique, 2010, 60 (11): 843-859.
[5] KARLSRUDK, LUNNET, KORTD A, et al. CPTU correlations for clays [C]//ICSMGE. Proc. 16th ICSMGE, Osaka, Japan, 2005. Osaka: ICSMGE, 2005: 396-702.
[6] WANGB, BROOKSG R, HUNTERJ A M. Geotechnical investigations of a large landslide site at Quyon [C]//Geology Survey of Canada. Proc. GeoQuébec, Québec, Canada, 2015. Québec: Geology Survey of Canada, 2015: 355.
[7] POWELLJ J M, QUARTERMANR S T. The interpretation of cone penetration tests in clays with particular reference to rate effects [C]//Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc. Proc. 1 st Int. Symp. on Penetration Testing, Orlando, FL, USA, 1988. Orlando: Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc, 1988: 903-909.
[8] MAYNEP W, PEUCHENJ. Cone penetration testing 2018 [M]. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 2018.
[9] MAYNEP W. Interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests [C]//ISSMGE. Proc. 3rd International Symposium on CPT, Las Vegas, USA, 2014. Las Vegas: ISSMGE, 2014: 47-73.
[10] SCHMERTMANNJ H. Static cone to compute static settlement over sand [J]. Journal of soil mechanics and foundations, 1970, 96(3): 1011-1043.