高级检索

基于二阶锥松弛的柔性软开关选址定容与多周期功率流优化

A Soft Open Points Siting, Sizing, and Multi-Period Power Flow Optimization Based on Second-Order Cone Relaxation

  • 摘要:
    目的 随着风能、光伏等分布式能源(Distributed Generation, DG)的广泛接入,配电网在提高能源利用效率的同时,也面临电压越限、潮流反转和线损增加等运行问题。柔性软开关(Soft Open Point, SOP)作为新型电力电子设备,具有灵活调节潮流、增强网络可控性的优势,成为构建柔性互联配电网的重要手段。为此,文章针对DG出力不确定性和负荷时序性引发的运行挑战,提出一种综合成本驱动的SOP选址定容与多周期优化调度方法。
    方法 将SOP的2个换流器容量作为连续变量引入建模框架,基于二阶锥松弛理论,构建混合整数二阶锥规划(Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming, MISOCP)模型,在考虑DG出力波动和负荷变化的基础上,最小化SOP配置成本与配电网线损成本之和,实现对SOP位置、容量及24个时段功率流的协同优化。所提模型使用YALMIP建模工具与Gurobi 12.0求解器进行求解。
    结果 在IEEE 33节点系统上开展算例分析,结果表明:所提方法能有效降低系统线损约15%,减少SOP投资与运营成本约12%,并显著改善电压分布特性,提升电能质量。同时,相较于不配置SOP的情况,优化配置下系统运行的经济性与可靠性均得到显著增强。
    结论 所提优化方法兼顾运行成本与电压质量,具备良好的适应性与工程实用性。在高比例DG接入背景下,该方法为SOP的科学配置提供了切实可行的解决方案,对提升配电网的柔性运行能力和新能源友好接纳水平具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective With the large-scale integration of distributed energy resources such as wind and solar power, distribution networks are experiencing increasing operational challenges, including voltage violations, reverse power flows, and rising line losses. Soft open points (SOPs), as a new type of power electronic equipment, provide flexible power flow control and enhanced network controllability, making them a key solution for constructing flexible interconnected distribution networks. This paper addresses the configuration problem of SOPs under uncertainty in DG output and load variation.
    Method A mixed-integer second-order cone programming (MISOCP) model was proposed to jointly optimize the location, sizing (as continuous variables), and multi-period power flow of SOPs. The model aimed to minimize the total cost, including SOP installation and operation costs as well as network line losses, while accounting for the temporal characteristics of load and the uncertainty of DG output. The proposed model was solved using the YALMIP toolbox and the Gurobi 12.0 solver.
    Result Case studies on the IEEE 33-bus distribution system show that the proposed method reduces line losses by approximately 15% and lowers the SOP configuration cost by around 12%, while significantly improving voltage profiles and enhancing power quality. Compared with scenarios without SOPs, the optimized configuration also improves system economic efficiency and reliability.
    Conclusion The proposed SOP planning and optimization method effectively balances operational cost and voltage regulation performance, demonstrating strong adaptability and practical value. It offers a viable solution for SOP configuration under high penetration of distributed generation, contributing to enhanced flexibility and renewable energy hosting capacity of distribution networks.

     

/

返回文章
返回