高级检索

广东省核能综合利用路径、典型场景与未来展望

Path, Typical Scenarios and Future Prospects of Comprehensive Utilization of Nuclear Energy in Guangdong Province

  • 摘要:
    目的 广东省是我国最早建设发展核电的省份之一,在运核电规模居全国首位,但利用方式以发电为主,核能综合利用方式较少。文章针对广东省核能综合利用路径及典型场景开展研究,为广东省开展核能综合利用提供发展思路及发展建议。
    方法 针对核能工业供热、核能制氢及海水淡化三种主要的核能综合利用方式,分析对比各技术路径的优劣,并结合广东省核电发展现状及规划,以目前在运、在建和已纳入规划的核电站为依托,结合电站周边应用场景,提出适宜的核能综合利用方案,并对方案的经济效益、环境效益等进行分析。
    结果 工业供热方面,惠州太平岭核电、汕尾陆丰核电距当地大型石油化工园区供热距离均超过40 km,采用热电联产长距离供热技术经济性不高,建议采用小堆供热方案,供热成本约45元/GJ。核能制氢方面,核热制氢平准化成本低于核电制氢,略高于煤气化和甲烷重整制氢。海水淡化方面,反渗透法淡化水成本约3.86元/m3,其中初始投资折旧在制水成本中占比最高,约30%,其次是电费成本,占比约27%。
    结论 建议惠州或汕尾远期采用小堆供热方案对当地化工园区就近供热;建议推进茂名绿能项目第四代高温气冷堆项目前期工作时考虑耦合制氢方案,打造高温气冷堆与石化产业耦合示范;建议陆丰核电机组全部投产后采用反渗透海水淡化技术为电站提供生产生活用水。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Guangdong Province is one of the earliest provinces in China to build and develop nuclear power, with the largest operational nuclear power capacity in China, but the utilization mode is mainly for power generation, and the comprehensive utilization of nuclear energy are relatively few. This article conducts research on the paths and typical scenarios of the comprehensive utilization of nuclear energy in Guangdong Province, providing development ideas and suggestions for the comprehensive utilization of nuclear energy in Guangdong.
    Method Focusing on the three main ways of comprehensive utilization of nuclear energy, namely industrial heating, hydrogen production, and seawater desalination, the advantages and disadvantages of each technical path were analyzed and compared. Based on the current situation and planning of nuclear power development in Guangdong Province, considering the nuclear power plants that are currently in operation, under construction or planned, combined with the application scenarios around the power plants, and appropriate comprehensive utilization schemes of nuclear energy were proposed. The economic and environmental benefits of the schemes were also analyzed.
    Result In terms of industrial heating, the distance from Huizhou Taipingling Nuclear Power Plant and Shanwei Lufeng Nuclear Power Plant to the local large-scale petrochemical industrial parks both exceed 40 km, making it difficult and uneconomical to adopt combined heat and power generation technology. It is recommended to adopt small reactor heating solutions, with a heating cost of approximately 45 yuan/GJ. Regarding hydrogen production, the levelized cost of nuclear heat hydrogen production is lower than that of nuclear power hydrogen production but slightly higher than that of coal gasification and methane reforming hydrogen production. In terms of seawater desalination, the cost of desalinated water by reverse osmosis method is about 3.86yuan /m3, of which depreciation of initial investment accounts for the highest proportion of water production cost, about 30%, followed by electricity cost, about 27%.
    Conclusion It is recommended that in the long term, Huizhou or Shanwei adopt the small reactor heating scheme to provide heat for the local petrochemical industrial parks. It is recommended that when promoting the preliminary work of the fourth-generation high - temperature gas - cooled reactor project of Maoming Green Energy Project, a hydrogen - production coupling scheme be considered to create a demonstration of the coupling between the high - temperature gas - cooled reactor and the petrochemical industry. After all units of the Lufeng Nuclear Power Plant are fully operational, reverse osmosis seawater desalination technology can be used to provide production and domestic water for the power plant.

     

/

返回文章
返回