高级检索

循环多轨斜坡重力储能技术方案研究与模块化设计

Research and Modular Design of a Cyclic Multi-Track Ramp Gravity Energy Storage System

  • 摘要:
    目的 为克服高比例可再生能源接入电网带来的功率波动挑战,文章旨在探索并推进重力储能技术,以期提供一种可靠、大规模的电能储存方案。
    方法 文章基于成本控制与多因素分析,构建了模块化的兆瓦级山体斜坡重力储能单机组方案,可扩展至多轨道多机组群。
    结果 系统功率与斜坡高度呈强正相关,当功率≥1 MW时,单轨道最大拖曳载荷可能低于总在线重物块质量,此时可采用单轨双电机分担载荷。多轨道并行运行可突破单机容量限制,实现更高功率输出,同时降低对单个重物块质量和系统高度的要求。成本分析显示,功率每增加1 MW,总成本约增加20%~30%。
    结论 对于兆瓦级系统,多轨道并行循环设计能有效提升功率并优化经济性,模块化方案兼具可扩展性与工程适应性。实际应用需综合权衡功率需求、地形条件、设备选型及成本投入,优先选择较高斜坡以兼顾效率与成本效益,为可再生能源消纳提供可靠支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To address the power fluctuations challenges arising from high-penetration renewable energy integration into the grid, this research aims to explore and advance gravity energy storage technology, with the goal of providing a reliable and large-scale electricity storage solution.
    Method Based on cost control and multi-factor analysis, this study developed a modular design scheme for a single MW-level mountain slope gravity energy storage unit. This scheme was designed to be scalable to multi-track, multi-unit clusters.
    Result System power exhibits a strong positive correlation with slope height. When power ≥ 1 MW, the maximum traction load on a single track may be less than the total mass of the active mass blocks. In such cases, a dual-motor configuration on a single track can be employed to share the load. Operating multiple tracks in parallel can overcome the capacity limitation of a single unit, enabling higher power output while simultaneously reducing the required individual mass block mass and overall system height. Cost analysis shows that for every 1 MW increase in power, the total cost increases by approximately 20%~30%.
    Conclusion For MW-level systems, a parallel multi-track cycling design effectively enhances power output and optimizes economic performance. The modular scheme offers both scalability and engineering adaptability. Practical implementation requires comprehensive trade-offs considering power requirements, terrain conditions, equipment selection, and cost investment. Prioritizing higher slopes is recommended to balance efficiency with cost-effectiveness, thereby providing reliable support for renewable energy integration.

     

/

返回文章
返回