高级检索

考虑风电消纳的多机组热电解耦改造规划模型

A Planning Model for Power-Heat Decoupling Retrofit of Multi-Units Considering Wind Power Accommodation

  • 摘要:
    目的 热电解耦有助于打破热电厂“以热定电”约束,提高热电厂低谷调峰能力并促进风电消纳。
    方法 以往研究通常只考虑新增蓄热罐和新增电锅炉这2种热电解耦改造措施,而文章额外考虑了低压缸零出力改造,并分析这3种改造措施对应的多种设备运行模型,由此建立了一种多机组热电解耦改造规划模型,能够联合优化燃煤和燃气-蒸汽联合循环供热机组的低压缸零出力改造决策、蓄热罐功率和容量的配置以及电锅炉功率配置。
    结果 案例仿真检验了所提出模型的有效性,发现3种热电解耦措施都可有效降低供热期弃风比例,最大降幅达11.64个百分点。
    结论 案例分析还表明,相比选取一种改造措施,即只新增蓄热罐、只新增电锅炉和只有低压缸改造,将3种改造措施搭配使用可进一步降低系统发电成本,长期来看可以提升系统投资和运行的综合经济性,年化总成本分别降低8.98%、19.15%和13.08%。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Power-heat decoupling can help break the constraint of "fixing electricity by heat" in thermal power plants, improve the peak-shaving capabilities of thermal power plants, and promote wind power accommodation.
    Method Whereas existing research generally only considered the addition of heat storage tanks and electric boilers in power-heat decoupling retrofit, this paper additionally considered the zero-output retrofit of the low-pressure cylinder. It analyzed the various equipment operating models corresponding to these three retrofit measures, thus establishing a planning model for the power-heat decoupling retrofit of multi-units. This model could jointly optimize the zero-output retrofit decisions for the low-pressure cylinders of coal-fired and gas-steam combined cycle heating units, the power and capacity configuration of heat storage tanks, and the power configuration of electric boilers.
    Result Case simulations tested the effectiveness of the proposed model and found that all three power-heat decoupling measures can effectively reduce the proportion of wind curtailment during the heating period, with the maximum reduction reaching 11.64 percentage points.
    Conclusion The case analysis also shows that, compared to selecting only one retrofit measure (i.e., only adding heat storage tanks, only adding electric boilers, or only retrofitting the low-pressure cylinder), combining the three retrofit measures can further reduce the system's power generation cost. In the long run, this can improve the overall economics of system investment and operation, with the annualized total cost reduced by 8.98%, 19.15%, and 13.08%, respectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回