Advanced Search
Zhenghua CAI, Jun ZHANG, Qianni LIU, Yangfan LIU, Yufeng ZHANG. Index Quantification Method of 3C Green Power Grid Construction Evaluation Standard[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 6(S1): 103-106. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2019.S1.020
Citation: Zhenghua CAI, Jun ZHANG, Qianni LIU, Yangfan LIU, Yufeng ZHANG. Index Quantification Method of 3C Green Power Grid Construction Evaluation Standard[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 6(S1): 103-106. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2019.S1.020

Index Quantification Method of 3C Green Power Grid Construction Evaluation Standard

More Information
  • Received Date: March 11, 2019
  • Revised Date: May 05, 2019
  •     [Introduction]   By combing and quantifying the indexes, the weights of the first, second and third grade indexes of the green power grid are obtained.
        [Method]   In 2013, China Southern Power Grid Company issued "3C Green Power Grid Construction Evaluation Standard" , which was used to guide the construction of Green Grid of Southern Power Grid Company. In the process of standard extension, researchers found that the standard used a " list" evaluation system, which had a weak guiding effect on the selection of technology for the project. In 2017 and 2018, Southern China Power Grid Company launched a revision of the standards. The weight of the index is determined by the group expert analytic hierarchy process, which combines the advantages of the group expert method and the analytic hierarchy process method, and relied on the decision making of the group expert, and reduces the error of the group expert decision by mathematical method. It was suitable for the quantification of green power grid.
        [Result]   Setting up a pool of experts that includes leaders and technological experts, carry out the first-level index scoring work for the leaders, and carry out the secondary and tertiary index scoring work for the technological experts. According to analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the evaluation indexs of green power grid is combed and quantified.
        [Conclusion]   Group expert Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is suitable for the quantitative evaluation of green power grid. This index quantification work is the solid foundation for the green grid quantification appraisal work.
  • [1]
    李涛,伍雯璨,何文芳. 国际典型绿色建筑评价体系比较与综合分析 [J]. 华中建筑,2015, 33(8): 10-13.
    [2]
    薛会琴. 多属性决策中指标权重确定方法的研究 [D]. 兰州:西北师范大学,2008.
    [3]
    刘猛,李百战,姚润明,等. 基于群体专家层次分析法的绿色工业建筑指标体系权重确定 [J]. 建设科技,2014(5): 33-37.
    [4]
    王玲玲. 专家成员在群体决策中作用的研究 [D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2005.
    [5]
    SAATY T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process [J]. Interfaces, 1994, 24(6): 9-26.
    [6]
    YU W, LI B, YANG X, et al. A development of a rating method and weighting system for green store buildings in China [J]. Renewable Energy, 2015(73): 123-129.
    [7]
    YANG Y, LI B, YAO R. A method of identifying and weighting indicators of energy efficiency assessment in Chinese residential buildings [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(12): 7687-7697.
    [8]
    张炳江. 层次分析法及其应用案例 [M]. 北京:电子工业出版社,2014.
    [9]
    郭晨鋆,徐笑,唐晟. 基于AHP和熵权法的中压配电网项目投资效益综合评价方法 [J]. 南方能源建设,2016, 3(增刊1): 9-13.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Zhixiang, JIANG Long, YAN Xu, KUANG Shifang, LU Zhanhui. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Electricity Market Risk Based on Subjective and Objective Weighting[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 10(6): 160-169. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.06.019
    [2]ZHANG Shu, XIE Jinlin, CHENG Yuanlin. Research on Decomposition of Urban Energy-Saving Indicator Based on Combination Weighting and Clustering[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 10(6): 112-119. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.06.013
    [3]CHEN Fangshu, YANG Xuebing, SHI Feng. Optimization Analysis of Permanent-Magnet Direct-Drive Wind Turbine Elbow Shape Nacelle[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 10(1): 154-159. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.01.020
    [4]WANG Hongqing, SUN Wei, LIU Donghua, REN Hao, TANG Dongsheng, FANG Hui. Statistical Analysis of Self-Weight Penetration and Pile Running for Large Diameter Monopiles in Offshore Wind Farm[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 10(1): 64-71. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2023.01.008
    [5]LI Bo, LIU Xinping. Evaluation of Intelligent Combustion Optimization Scheme for Thermal Power Unit Based on Optimal Weight Fusion[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 9(3): 94-101. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2022.03.011
    [6]Yiwei JIAO, Min XIE, Mingbo LIU, Runquan HE, Binbin HUANG, Zhichun HE. Research on Weight Allocation Method of Renewable Energy Consumption Responsibility Based on Evolutionary Game Stochastic Optimization[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 9(1): 122-129. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2022.01.018
    [7]Yongzhong CUI, Rong SU, Donghua LIU, Wei SUN. Self-weight Penetration Prediction Methods for Large Diameter Monopiles in Offshore Wind Farm[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 7(1): 40-46. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2020.01.006
    [8]Zhenghua CAI, Jun ZHANG, Qianni LIU, Yangfan LIU, Yufeng ZHANG. 《3C Green Power Grid Construction Evaluation Standard》 Application Investigation and Analysis: Green Substation[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 6(3): 120-125. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2019.03.020
    [9]Yanjie WANG, Guozhi XU. Research on Alternatives of Regional Electric Energy Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 5(4): 44-49. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2018.04.006
    [10]GUO Chenjun, XU Xiao, TANG Sheng. Comprehensive Evaluation for Medium-voltage Distribution System Construction Based on AHP and Entropy Weight Method[J]. SOUTHERN ENERGY CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 3(S1): 9-13. DOI: 10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2016.S1.003

Catalog

    Yufeng ZHANG

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed

    Article Metrics

    Article views (792) PDF downloads (33) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return